Everything about Hierarchy Of Genres totally explained
A
hierarchy of genres is any formalization which ranks different types of
genres in an art-form in terms of their value. The most well known set of hierarchies are those held by
academies in Europe between the
17th century and the modern era, and of these the hierarchy for the genres of painting held by the
Académie française which held a central role in
Academic art.
The argument regarding the aesthetic of painting, which continued to gain adherence since the
Renaissance, was of the importance of
allegory; the use of the pictorial elements of painting such as line and color to convey an ultimate unifying theme or idea. For this reason an
idealism was adopted in art, whereby forms seen in nature would be generalized, and in turn subordinated to the unity of the artwork. It aimed at universal truth through the imitation of "la belle nature". Many dissenting theorists of the time (such as
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing) held that this focus on
allegory was faulty and based on a wrong analogy between the plastic arts and poetry rooted in the
Horatian dictum
ut pictura poesis ("as is painting so is poetry").
Formulated in
1667 by
André Félibien, a historiographer, architect and theoretician of French classicism, the hierarchy of genres considered
history painting to be the
grand genre. History paintings included paintings with religious, mythological, historical, literary, or allegorical subjects—they embodied some interpretation of life or conveyed a moral or intellectual message. The gods and goddesses from the ancient mythologies represented different aspects of the human psyche, figures from religions represented different ideas, and history, like the other sources, represented a dialectic or play of ideas. For a long time, especially during the
French Revolution, history painting often focused on depiction of the heroic male nude; though this waned into the
19th century.
After history painting, next came, in order decreasing worth: scenes of everyday life (called
scènes de genre, or "
genre painting", and also
petit genre to contrast it with the
grande genre),
portraits,
landscapes, and finally
still-lifes. In his formulation, such paintings were inferior because they were merely reportorial pictures without moral force or artistic imagination. Genre paintings—neither ideal in style, nor elevated in subject—were admired for their skill, ingenuity, and even humour, but never confused with high art. The hierarchy of genres also had a corresponding hierarchy of formats: large format for history paintings, small format for still-lifes.
Félibien argued that the painter should imitate God, whose most perfect work is in man, and show groups of human figures and choose subjects from history and fable. "He must," writes Félibien, "like the historians, represent great events, or like the poets, subjects that will please; and mounting still higher, be skilled to conceal under the veil of fable the virtues of great men, and the most exalted mysteries."
The British painter
Sir Joshua Reynolds in his
Discourses of the
1770s and
1780s, reiterated the argument for still-life to the lowest position in the hierarchy of genres on the grounds that it interfered with the painter's access to central forms, those products of the mind's generalising powers. At the summit reigned history painting, centred on the human body: familiarity with the forms of the body permitted the mind of the painter, by comparing innumerable instances of the human form, to abstract from it those typical or central features that represented the body's essence or ideal.
Though Reynolds agreed with Félibien about the natural order of the genres; he held that an important work from any genre of painting could be produced under the hand of genius: "Whether it's the human figure, an animal, or even inanimate objects, there's nothing, however unpromising in appearance, but may be raised into dignity, convey sentiment, and produce emotion, in the hands of a painter of genius. What was said of
Virgil, that he threw even the dung about the ground with an air of dignity, may be applied to
Titian; whatever he touched, however naturally mean, and habitually familiar, by a kind of magic he invested with grandeur and importance."
Though European academies usually strictly insisted on this hierarchy, over their reign, many artists were able to invent new and unique genres which raised the lower subjects to the importance of history painting. Reynolds himself achieved this by inventing the portraiture style that was called the
Grand Manner, where he flattered his sitters by likening them to mythological characters.
Jean-Antoine Watteau invented a genre that was called
fêtes galantes, where he'd show scenes of courtly amusements taking place in Arcadian setting; these often had a poetic and allegorical quality which were considered to ennoble them.
Claude Lorrain practised a genre called the
ideal landscape, where a composition would be loosely based on nature and dotted with classical ruins as a setting for a biblical or historical theme. It artfully combined landscape and history painting, thereby legitimising the former. It is synonymous with the term
historical landscape which received official recognition in the Académie française when a Prix de Rome for the genre was established in
1817. Finally,
Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin was able to create still-life paintings that were considered to have the charm and beauty as to be placed alongside the best allegorical subjects. However, aware of this hierarchy, Chardin began including figures in his work in about
1730, mainly women and children.
Until the middle of the
19th century,
women were largely unable to paint history paintings as they were not allowed to participate in the final process of artistic training—that of life drawing, in order to protect their modesty. They could work from reliefs, prints, casts and from the Old Masters, but not from the nude model. Instead they were encouraged to participate in the lower painting forms such as portraiture, landscape and genre. These were considered more feminine in that they appealed to the eye rather than the mind.
Toward the end of the
19th century, painters and critics began to rebel against the many rules of the Académie française, including the preference for
history painting. New artistic movements included the
Realists and
Impressionists, which each sought to depict the present moment and daily life as observed by the eye, and unattatched from historical significance; the Realists often choosing genre painting and still-life, while the Impressionists would most often focus on landscapes. The history painting gained less favor through the vogue in Europe for Japanese culture and art, in the form of
Japonism—in Japan significant importance was placed upon items such as laquerware and porcelain.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Hierarchy Of Genres'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://hierarchy_of_genres.totallyexplained.com">Hierarchy of genres Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
